<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CareCrunch &#124; Helping Families Find Long Term Care, Home Health, and Funding &#187; Laurie Orlov</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carecrunch.com/author/laurie-orlov/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carecrunch.com</link>
	<description>Empowering Caregivers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Smoke signals and caregiving apps &#8212; what should they do?</title>
		<link>http://www.carecrunch.com/2010/04/10/smoke-signals-and-caregiving-apps-what-should-they-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carecrunch.com/2010/04/10/smoke-signals-and-caregiving-apps-what-should-they-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Orlov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carecrunch.com/?p=867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The year of the &#8216;care&#8217;. As one VC executive, Andy Donner of Physic Ventures, noted recently, this is the year of the &#8216;care&#8217;. There seems to be a growing list of vendors who are trying to offer some sort of &#8216;keep in touch&#8217; product that connects an older person with family members who may live [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The year of the &#8216;care&#8217;. </strong>As one VC executive, Andy  Donner of Physic Ventures, noted recently, this is the year of the  &#8216;care&#8217;. There seems to be a growing list of vendors who are trying to  offer some sort of &#8216;keep in touch&#8217; product that connects an older person  with family members who may live elsewhere.  The basic element is to  provide some means to signal &#8216;concerned about you&#8217; from family members  and obtain the response &#8216;I&#8217;m all right&#8217; from the older family member  back to them &#8212; accompanied by the ability to react in the event that  the response is not received. Add-ons include devices with environmental  sensors, health-related self-care devices, health record tracking,  reminders, and communication capabilities.</p>
<p><strong>The statistics offer a compelling backdrop &#8212; the &#8216;Florida&#8217;  problem. </strong>If you count the 44 million people estimated to be  caregivers, that&#8217;s an eye-popping number &#8212; and if you add various  valuations of the care they provide at $350 billion, we&#8217;re talking about  a sizable phenomenon &#8212; and an opportunity for well-designed assists  from technology innovators. The core characteristic of the problem that  vendors seem to be tackling is the fact that worried family members are  not physically present &#8212; the &#8216;Florida problem.&#8217;  Aging and sun-drenched  seniors have children who are scattered around the country and want to  know via an electronic smoke signal that all is okay with a mom or dad.  And vice-versa: Mom or Dad do not want to be pressured into leaving  Florida or Arizona or wherever to live near a daughter or son in New  Jersey or California.</p>
<p><strong>Ask yourself &#8212; who is the user, the buyer, the caregiver? </strong>Last  year, I heard ideas about charging seniors <strong>user</strong> fees  to participate in a caregiving app. That seems to have run its course,  thankfully. Now in general I hear that prospective <strong>buyers </strong>in  the &#8216;smoke signal&#8217; circle are adult children, but also included in this  circle are <strong>professional caregivers </strong>for notification,  perhaps a call center (think service fees), and if all else fails, 911.  Professionals that serve seniors can also be &#8216;buyers&#8217; for resale to  their constituent family members &#8212; think home care agencies, geriatric  care managers, and senior housing organizations &#8212; although it&#8217;s a new  business model and entrants seem uncertain about it.</p>
<p><strong>The caregiver market level of technology adoption. </strong>It&#8217;s  instructive to look at what technology caregivers say they use today:  in the recent <a title="Caregiving" href="http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/caregiving_09.pdf" target="_blank">Caregiving in the US of 50+,</a> 16%  of caregivers reported using an emergency response system, 12% use some  eHealth device, and 10% reported using safety-related sensors.  Twenty-three percent said they turn to the Internet for information,  although this seems low given that 8% also are seeking information from  government programs and another 14% from disease or age-related  programs, so easily found on the Internet. The top information need: 38%  (up from 31% in 2004) were concerned about &#8216;keeping recipients safe at  home&#8217;, followed by &#8216;easy activities to do with the recipient&#8217; (34%).</p>
<p><strong>What infrastructure do caregivers and recipients have?</strong> Let&#8217;s look at the late December, 2007 responses from caregivers in the <a title="Healthy@Home " href="http://www.aarp.org/research/surveys/life/lifestyle/computers/articles/healthy_home.html" target="_blank">AARP Healthy@Home</a> survey: 78%  said they have a computer, 51% said they had broadband, 81% had a cell  phone, and 71% said they had cable television. Staying with that same  survey, two-thirds of those 65+ have a computer in their home, one-third  had broadband (higher than the most recent <a title="Pew Research" href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Internet-broadband-and-cell-phone-statistics.aspx?r=1" target="_blank">Pew Research</a> number of 26%)and  42% have dial-up.</p>
<p><strong>Build assumptions around the facts. </strong>Caregivers are  users of technology, will access the Internet to solve problems they  have, most likely will search for what they know (like PERS devices or  government or age-related sites, then possibly disease-related). So as  you design software and web marketing, use these assumptions to design  websites and search terms. From the Caregiving Information Needs alone,  combining safety and care recipient activities (games, photo slide  shows, camera-based chat) would be optimal &#8212; transforming a minimalist  &#8216;smoke signal&#8217; interaction into a quality of life improvement. Does that  mean innovators have to build all that into their products? Not  necessarily &#8212; working with a channel partner or partnering with other  vendors could be the most sensible strategy.  Step 1 for entrants  considering whether to enter or what to do: attend a trade show event  where other vendors exhibit, so that you can self-educate and decide in a  larger context about functionality and partnerships.</p>
<p>Thoughts welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carecrunch.com/2010/04/10/smoke-signals-and-caregiving-apps-what-should-they-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.carecrunch.com @ 2012-02-05 03:52:38 -->
